Editorial

Editorial policy

How the two-person desk picks topics, sources numbers, runs transactions, writes risk language and handles corrections. Plain rules, written down once so we cannot bend them quietly.

1 · How a topic enters the pipeline

Three sources feed the topic list. Reader email — corrections, repeated questions, "I wish someone wrote about X" notes. Primary documents we read for our own portfolio — new attestation letters, regulator releases, court filings, exchange policy updates. Editor-run transactions that turned up something interesting — an unexpected fee, a quirky bridge route, a withdrawal that took longer than the marketing page promised.

Wen Lu writes a one-paragraph proposal: what the piece is, why now, who reads it, what data has to be inside. Heng Zhou marks anything that needs a fresh transaction, a new disclosure pull or a regulator citation. If we cannot say what an article would add beyond what the issuer already publishes, the topic is dropped.

2 · Editor-tested transactions

Every operational claim has a transaction behind it. The desk maintains two real wallets per chain — one for hot tests (small balance, throwaway addresses), one for slower review-style runs. When a piece talks about a fee figure, a bridge speed, a CEX confirmation count or a withdrawal allowance, the underlying hash and screenshot are stored privately and the figure is quoted in the article. If we cannot run the transaction (for example, a fee tier we do not qualify for), the article says so.

Numbers are pulled fresh. We do not republish a competitor's table. We do not quote a screenshot more than ninety days old without re-running.

3 · Source rules for every number

Each numerical claim has a source category attached:

News outlets and second-hand reporting are not sources. If a Bloomberg or Reuters piece points at a primary document, we read that document and cite it directly.

4 · Risk language

Risk does not get buried at the foot of a piece. It sits in the first three screens. Specifically:

5 · Tone

Short sentences. Specific verbs. Documents named by document. No hype. No "as we all know". No "ultimate" anything. If we cannot say something plainly, the paragraph is not finished.

The desk has a short list of banned phrases — generic crypto marketing language we do not let into a final draft. The list is maintained by Wen Lu and applied at proofread.

6 · Corrections

Three rules, repeated from the corrections page for clarity:

7 · Conflicts of interest

The desk earns a referral service fee from Binance through code BN16188. That is the only commercial relationship on the site. It is disclosed at the top of every page, on the disclaimer and at the foot of any article that mentions Binance.

No issuer pays the desk. No exchange other than Binance pays the desk. No project provides "marketing tokens" in exchange for coverage. If a future commercial relationship is added, it goes on this page first.

8 · Use of AI tools

The desk uses AI tools the same way most editorial outlets now do — for brainstorming outlines, for first-pass language checks, for summarising long PDFs into reading notes. AI output never appears unedited on the site. Every published paragraph is written or re-written by Wen Lu or Heng Zhou after the source documents are read by hand.