The thirty-second version
PYUSD is a US-dollar stablecoin issued by Paxos Trust Company on behalf of PayPal, under a New York limited-purpose trust charter and subject to NYDFS supervision. The token launched on Ethereum in August 2023, was extended to Solana in May 2024, and migrated the bulk of operational activity (mint, burn, transfers) to Solana over the following twelve months. Reserves are held in segregated accounts at US banks plus US Treasury bills, attested monthly. As of mid-2026 PYUSD circulating supply sits at roughly 800 million to 1.2 billion across both chains, with Solana holding the majority.
The launch, and what was novel about it
PYUSD launched on Ethereum as a Paxos-issued ERC-20 token. The launch was framed as a US-regulated, US-supervised, US-bank-backed stablecoin from a major listed payment company. The novelty was structural: most prior US-supervised stablecoins (USDC, BUSD, USDP, GUSD) had been issued by crypto-native firms; PYUSD was the first by a $50B+ market cap fintech with retail consumer reach.
The product's positioning relied on PayPal's domestic user base (about 200 million active accounts at the time, with US, EU and emerging markets distribution). Users could buy, sell and transfer PYUSD inside the PayPal app — for many holders, the first stablecoin they encountered without leaving a familiar interface. The integration was friction-free in a way that earlier stablecoin products had not been.
Adoption was slow in the first six months. PYUSD circulation reached roughly 150 to 250 million by early 2024, well below pre-launch expectations. The market read it as a structural problem with the Ethereum gas-fee profile for small-payment use cases: 25 USD in gas for a 20 USD merchant payment is not a workable model.
PayPal extended PYUSD to Solana. The same Paxos issuer; a new chain. The decision was driven directly by the gas-fee problem: Solana transactions cost a fraction of a US cent, settle in approximately 400 milliseconds, and support payment-app use cases that Ethereum mainnet could not.
Within twelve months of the Solana launch, the chain-level supply distribution had inverted. By mid-2025 Solana held more PYUSD than Ethereum; by mid-2026 the ratio sits at roughly 70/30 in favour of Solana. The on-chain transfer count per day is now mostly Solana-native.
The Solana move was, in retrospect, a strong vote against Ethereum mainnet as a settlement layer for retail payment products. The same logic explains Stripe's stablecoin payment integration choosing Base (an Ethereum L2) and Circle's USDC deploying aggressively on Solana, Sui, Aptos and other low-fee chains in 2024-2025.
The reserve composition and supervision
PYUSD reserves are held by Paxos under the same regulatory regime that supervises USDP (Paxos's own-brand stablecoin). The reserves comprise:
- US Treasury bills, primarily under 90-day maturity — typically 70 to 80% of total reserves.
- Overnight reverse repurchase agreements with the Federal Reserve or with primary dealer counterparties — 10 to 20%.
- Cash deposits at US-regulated banks — 5 to 10%.
- Money-market fund holdings (small allocations) — 0 to 5%.
The reserves are bankruptcy-remote at the Paxos trust company level. In the event of a Paxos insolvency, PYUSD holders would have a priority claim against the segregated trust reserves under New York trust law, which is a different and stronger position than holders of a deposit account at an insolvent bank (where FDIC insurance caps apply at 250,000 per depositor per institution).
The supervisory regime is the NYDFS limited-purpose trust company framework. The same framework that allowed NYDFS to order Paxos to halt new BUSD issuance in February 2023 applies to PYUSD. A NYDFS action against PYUSD is theoretically possible on the same basis — i.e., on oversight-relationship grounds rather than reserve-quality grounds. The risk is structurally identical to the BUSD situation, with one important difference: PayPal is a US-listed company with substantial US regulatory presence already, whereas Binance was an offshore exchange when the BUSD action was taken. The political calculus for a regulator considering an action would be different.
The commerce use case · what is actually happening
The strategic bet behind PYUSD is that stablecoin-based payments will eventually capture some share of the card-network and ACH volumes that PayPal's core business runs on. The hypothesis has four components:
What is not yet happening
The big consumer-facing use case — pay for an ordinary online purchase with PYUSD — has not yet broken out. The reasons are partly chicken-and-egg (few merchants accept, so few users hold; few users hold, so few merchants integrate) and partly structural (consumer credit cards earn 1 to 2% in rewards, which stablecoin payments do not match). PayPal's own checkout flow does support PYUSD acceptance but the share of PayPal checkout volume settled in PYUSD remains under 1% as of mid-2026.
The B2B large-merchant use case is also slower than expected. Companies like Shopify and Stripe have stablecoin payment offerings, but they have chosen USDC as the primary settlement asset rather than PYUSD. The reason is partly distribution (USDC has broader cross-chain availability), partly integration (USDC has more developer tooling), and partly brand (USDC is more recognisable as a "neutral" stablecoin where PYUSD is associated with PayPal's commercial position).
How PYUSD compares to USDC for everyday use
For an ordinary US-resident holder asking "should I use PYUSD or USDC?", the answer depends on which interfaces you already use:
- If you have a PayPal account and want zero-friction on-ramp from a bank, PYUSD has the cleanest UX. The integration inside the PayPal app means you do not need to manage a separate wallet.
- If you trade on centralised crypto exchanges, USDC has deeper trading pairs, cleaner cross-venue routing, and broader cross-chain availability. PYUSD on Solana is supported on a handful of venues; PYUSD on Ethereum is supported on more but at higher gas cost.
- If you use on-chain DeFi for yield or borrowing, USDC is meaningfully more useful. PYUSD lending markets exist on Solana but are smaller and shallower than USDC equivalents.
- If you make cross-border remittance, PYUSD on Solana has become a credible option — particularly for Philippines, Mexico and India corridors where PayPal already has user reach.
The desk's working stablecoin mix does not include PYUSD by default, because the use cases we have do not match the product's strongest areas. For a US retail user with significant PayPal usage and remittance needs, the answer might be different.
The structural risks for PYUSD holders
The NYDFS oversight-relationship vector
NYDFS halted new BUSD issuance in February 2023 over the oversight relationship between Paxos and Binance. A similar action against PYUSD would require NYDFS to find supervisory issues in the Paxos / PayPal relationship. PayPal is a US-incorporated, US-listed, US-supervised company; the political backdrop is meaningfully different than the Binance situation. We do not view this as a high-probability risk, but it is the same structural vector that ended BUSD and should not be ignored.
The Solana chain risk
PYUSD's growth has been concentrated on Solana. Solana's track record on uptime improved substantially in 2024-2025, but the chain remains less battle-tested than Ethereum mainnet under sustained adversarial pressure. A material Solana outage would freeze the majority of PYUSD activity. The risk is not catastrophic for the token (holders retain redemption rights with Paxos, separate from the chain) but it is meaningful for the use case.
The PayPal strategic-priority vector
Stablecoins are one of several growth initiatives at PayPal. A change in strategic priority — for example, if the regulatory environment makes the product more expensive to operate, or if a competing product (Stripe stablecoin, a bank-issued alternative) captures the market share PayPal targeted — could result in PayPal de-prioritising the PYUSD distribution effort. Paxos would continue to issue the token; PayPal's promotional support is a different question.
If you want to act on this
The narrow action is to consider whether PYUSD has a fit for your use case. For US retail users with remittance flows, the answer is increasingly yes. For trading and yield use cases, USDC and USDT remain stronger. The desk uses Binance as the primary spot venue; the Binance referral link uses code BN16188 and does not change your fees. For more on the stablecoin landscape, see our reserve transparency comparison.
PYUSD primary documents
- PayPal press release, "PayPal Launches U.S. Dollar Stablecoin", August 7, 2023.
- Paxos PYUSD reserve attestations (WithumSmith+Brown), monthly from August 2023 to present, on paxos.com.
- PayPal Q4 2024 and Q1 2025 earnings calls — disclosures on PYUSD volume and product strategy.
- Solana ecosystem disclosures, on-chain explorers (solscan.io, solana.fm) for PYUSD-SPL token supply over time.
- Etherscan PYUSD contract: 0x6c3ea9036406852006290770BEdFcAbA0e23A0e8 — historical supply and transfer data.
- NYDFS supervisory framework, "Guidance on the Issuance of US Dollar-backed Stablecoins", June 2022.
For corrections or updates we should reflect, write to [email protected]; the corrections log is on the corrections page.